翻訳と辞書 ・ McDonogh 35 High School ・ McDonogh Day Boycott ・ McDonogh High School ・ McDonogh School ・ McDonogh, Louisiana ・ McDonough ・ McDonough (disambiguation) ・ McDonough Bolyard Peck ・ McDonough Center ・ McDonough County Courthouse ・ McDonough County, Illinois ・ McDonough Gymnasium ・ McDonough Museum of Art ・ McDonough Nunataks ・ McDonough Park ・ McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood ・ McDonough School of Business ・ McDonough, Delaware ・ McDonough, Georgia ・ McDonough, New York ・ McDorman ・ McDougal, Arkansas ・ McDougald ・ McDougald Township, Lake of the Woods County, Minnesota ・ McDougall ・ McDougall Falls ・ McDougall Lake ・ McDougall Mills, Ontario ・ McDougall Sound ・ McDougall United Church
|
|
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood : ウィキペディア英語版 | McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood
''McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood'', 464 U.S. 548 (1984), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that established a standard for challenging a verdict based on inaccurate answers given by prospective jurors during voir dire.〔Yeazell, S.C. ''Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition.'' Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 594〕 == Background == Bill Greenwood was a juvenile in Kansas whose feet were severed on a riding riding lawnmower manufactured by McDonough. Before the three-week trials, one of the jurors failed to disclose that her son had sustained a broken leg as a result of an exploding tire. Although McDonough would likely have used a peremptory challenge if they had known the background, there was no direct conflict of interest and the rest of the jurors quickly ruled against the manufacturer in deliberations.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|